Deadline for abstract submission is 11:59 p.m. (PDT) April 17th, 2023
It is of utmost importance to comply with formatting guidelines. Failure to do so will delay the abstract review process and final response to authors.
Abstracts should represent original material related to the science, scholarship of
teaching/learning, and/or the practice of anesthesia and analgesia. Abstracts of previously
published or presented materials will not be considered. For example, an abstract presented
during the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists (AVA) meeting must not be submitted.
Abstracts are limited to 250 OR 300 words. Authors must indicate their word limit preference
during the submission process, as well as take full responsibility for any consequences resulting
from this choice. Authors should be aware that for some journals, the publication of abstracts
greater than 250 words constitutes prior publication.
Please do not ignore spacing guidelines (see below) in order to meet the word limit. All
abstracts will be submitted using the online process. For more detailed abstract guidelines, please
see the ACVAA Abstract Guidelines below; this information will also be available at the
ACVAA, ACVS, and submission websites.
Single case reports will not be accepted. Authors may contact the abstract program
coordinator(s) with any questions during the submission process.
Abstracts must be submitted electronically by the specified deadline. Late submissions will not
be accepted. The corresponding author will receive an electronic receipt confirming their
abstract was received. Abstracts failing to comply with formatting guidelines will be
returned to the author(s) without review (see below; please pay particular attention to
spacing). Re-submissions will only be accepted PRIOR to the abstract submission deadline.
Two reviewers will evaluate each abstract using a standard scoring form. Abstracts are assigned
with all potential conflicts eliminated. Conflicts include but are not limited to: co-authors, co-
workers (or previous), research advisors, and mentors. Reviewers from the same institution as
the authors will also be avoided. Identification of potential conflicts will be the task of the
editor(s). Reviewers will be blinded to authors and their affiliations for the entire review process.
A third reviewer will be assigned whenever possible, otherwise the editor(s) may serve as
additional reviewers when agreement is not reached by the original two assigned reviewers.
It is recommended that presentations be hypothesis-driven and conform to a format similar to
that of the written abstract. Specifics regarding submission of the presentation and times
allocated for abstract presentation and questions will be made available to authors following
acceptance of the written abstract.
Authors may have the option of abstract presentation at a joint ACVS-ACVAA poster session.
You will be invited during the acceptance phase of the process if you are eligible for poster
ACVAA Resident Award
To be considered for the ACVAA resident award, the presenter must be in an approved ACVAA
or ECVAA residency training program at the time of abstract submission, or have completed
their training program within the same calendar year as their abstract submission. All trainees
(MSc, PhD, interns, students, etc.) will be recognized as such in the program, but only ACVAA
or ECVAA residents will be eligible for the ACVAA resident awards.
The ACVAA resident award committee will evaluate and recognize the two most outstanding
oral presentations given by an ACVAA or ECVAA resident (one award for each room). The
award committee will be made up of 3 individuals in each room, and scheduling of presentations
will be arranged to ensure that all reviewers are able to review all eligible resident presentations
whenever possible. Under circumstances where this is not possible, additional reviewers may be
recruited such that 3 reviewers will evaluate each presentation while avoiding potential conflicts
as mentioned previously. Each presentation will be graded based upon standard scoring criteria.
For questions regarding the requirements for the ACVAA abstracts, please contact Dr. Lane
Johnson at email@example.com
ACVAA Abstract Guidelines
Conference abstracts are submitted via the online submission system. Pending final approval from the
Editors, accepted abstracts will be published both in IVECCS/ACVAA proceedings as well as in title
form in the VAA journal and in full electronically on the website. Abstracts may be edited to comply with
VAA guidelines. Additional formatting information may be found at:
Separate confirmation of ethical approval will be required
Stating ethical approval within the abstract is not required
*The abstract editors retain the right to reject manuscripts on the basis of animal ethical or welfare concerns*
All abstracts must be written in English. American or UK spelling is acceptable, but please be consistent
through the text
The abstract text MUST NOT exceed 250 (or 300 for VAA) words
This count does not include Title, Authors or Institution
Please do not ignore spacing guidelines in order to meet the count word limit, proper spacing for units is also to be used. You will risk abstract rejection or additional editing if you do not comply with the specific formatting guidelines (see below).
The title is inserted in the relevant place on the submission. In the main document, type the title in bold
• List the authors’ initials and surname
• Include the institution & address where the work was performed
Text of abstract
The following sections should be included, BUT subheadings should NOT be used.
THE HEADINGS BELOW INDICATE THE SECTIONS EXPECTED. DO NOT WRITE THESE
HEADINGS, i.e.avoid ‘INTRODUCTION’, ETC IN THE ABSTRACT ITSELF
Introduction should be concise and summarize the reasons for the study and its relevance to anesthesia and analgesia. It should not exceed three lines.
Material and methods must provide sufficient details to allow the quality of the study to be evaluated. Specific details of the number of animals studied, body weight, dose of drugs given must be recorded. Generic names should be used for all drugs. Statistical methods must be briefly described.
Results must include data. Parametric data should be presented as mean ± SD. Nonparametric data should be presented as median values (range). All data should be given in SI units (see below) with the exception of arterial blood pressure measurement, which should be reported in mmHg. Results should be limited to data required to support the conclusion(s).
Conclusions should be drawn from the data presented in the abstract without repetition of results.
Figures, tables, and illustrations should NOT be included in an abstract.
An abstract should NOT include footnotes or references.
Specific formatting guidelines
These are the same guidelines as for the journal Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. NOTE: All
abstracts are automatically included for publication in the journal as ACVAA abstracts if accepted by
• Do not use ® or TM signs
• Manufacturer data not required for abstract
Style and General Arrangement
Manuscripts must be written in English and must conform to the guidelines on the Elsevier Manuscripts site or they will be returned immediately to the author(s) for correction.
The typescript should be Times New Roman 12pt.
Units (with some examples):
– Blood pressure: mmHg
– Airway pressure: cm H2O
– Otherwise SI units, except for blood gas and vapour pressure values where both mmHg and kPA should
– Drug dosages: mg kg-1, mg kg-1 hr-1
– Concentration: µg mL-1, L kg-1
– Flow: L minute-1
Abbreviations should be defined in the abstract:
*Intravenous (IV), Intramuscular (IM)
*Respiratory frequency (fR)
*Tidal Volume (V̇T)
*Minute Ventilation (V̇E)
*Cardiac Output (Q̇t) or (CO)
*Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)
– Use numerals for numbers greater than 10 and words for numbers less than 10.
* Use numerals for things that are measured (5 weeks, 5 minutes)
* Use words for things that are not measured (five cats, five cells)
* Try to avoid numerals at the beginning of the sentence
* Always write ordinal numbers in full (fourth not 4th year)
* Use % (50% of cats not 50 percent)